Blog Reflection 2 (PLN)

The process of this technology proposal has been very straightforward. I would say the biggest challenge was trying to equate it to a learning theory. While there is learning done in libraries, a lot of the learning theories are more pertinent to classroom learning. After spending time reading class articles and discussion boards, I was able to make a connection between my technology proposal and learning theory. Using the Cognitive Theory of Learning, I assessed how my technology proposal would help the students process data. This theory supports the idea that acquiring knowledge, storing, and organizing are a priority of processing data. While my proposed technology is not technically used for learning in the classroom, it would be of great help to the students and the faculty's learning practices. I still believe that my technology proposal would be of great benefit to my library and all our constituents. I was happy to note the support I received from my coworkers about my technology proposal. They expressed much support after I presented my plan to them and reassured me that I was on the right path. I think that it is important that librarians realize that they are learning specialists/instructional designers, too. The library is more than a place that houses books; it is also a place of resources and technology. It is important that librarians consider the importance of making sure all their patrons have access to accessible and equitable resources that will enhance their learning. Librarians are facilitators of information and resources; we must be able to answer the call for cutting-edge technology that will enhance the day-to-day lives of our students and faculty.

References

Ertmer. P & Newby. T. (2013). “Behaviorism. Cognitivism. Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective.” Performance Improvement Quarterly. 26 (20). 43-71.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

EDU 779 Reflection

Reflection 1 (PLN)